[Gepsc] responses to reviewers

Greg Wilson gvwilson at third-bit.com
Fri Feb 17 08:38:28 CST 2017


Thanks all.  Jenny is in South Africa at the moment and may not be able 
to respond - Justin?

Cheers,

G


On 2017-02-17 8:19 AM, Lex Nederbragt wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> OK from me, then!
>
> Lex
>
>> On 17 Feb 2017, at 13:59, Karen Cranston <karen.cranston at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:karen.cranston at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... compiles for me. I just updated the PDF on gh-pages. Fig 1 
>> now rendered inline.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 7:26 AM Lex Nederbragt 
>> <lex.nederbragt at ibv.uio.no <mailto:lex.nederbragt at ibv.uio.no>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     No comments on the reviewer response. I can’t yet give the
>>     go-ahead on the PDF as it is outdated relative to the tex file,
>>     and I want to make sure the issue with figure 1 is resolved. I
>>     get an error building the PDF myself (repo at ce8021e).
>>
>>     Lex
>>
>>>     On 16 Feb 2017, at 16:05, Greg Wilson <gvwilson at third-bit.com
>>>     <mailto:gvwilson at third-bit.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Thanks again for pulling together the reply, Karen - thumbs up
>>>     from me.  I've merged the PR with additional references.
>>>
>>>     Jenny, Justin, and Lex, are we good to go?
>>>
>>>     Cheers,
>>>
>>>     Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 2017-02-15 12:26 PM, Karen Cranston wrote:
>>>>     (trying this again, now that I have finally realized that my
>>>>     primary email address was silently failing on this list)
>>>>
>>>>     Here is a revised version of the response to reviewers. Given
>>>>     that we don't have permission to share the reviews publicly, I
>>>>     didn't put this in the github repo.
>>>>
>>>>     I think the only two things left to do are:
>>>>
>>>>     1) Thumbs up or down on the attached response to reviewers
>>>>     2) Merge
>>>>     https://github.com/swcarpentry/good-enough-practices-in-scientific-computing/pull/189
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Cheers,
>>>>     Karen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Gepsc mailing list
>>>>     Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org
>>>>     <mailto:Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org>
>>>>     http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/gepsc
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>     Nihil pro nobis sine nobis.
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Gepsc mailing list
>>>     Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org
>>>     <mailto:Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org>
>>>     http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/gepsc
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Gepsc mailing list
>>     Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org
>>     <mailto:Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org>
>>     http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/gepsc
>>
>

-- 
Nihil pro nobis sine nobis.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.software-carpentry.org/pipermail/gepsc/attachments/20170217/3df6a72f/attachment.html>


More information about the Gepsc mailing list