[Gepsc] final call - vote needed on one section
lex.nederbragt at ibv.uio.no
Thu Feb 2 13:55:45 CST 2017
Apologies for lack of input from me, I’ve been buried in Research Bazaar preparations and activities (which luckily is loads of fun!). I hope to have a look at the paper tomorrow morning (night/early morning US time).
> On 02 Feb 2017, at 16:18, Greg Wilson <gvwilson at third-bit.com> wrote:
> I've integrated Tracy's PR with Jenny's comments, and I think there's only one major issue to resolve. If you look at:
> and go down to line 1205, Tracy suggests taking out the detailed analysis of why we recommend two different approaches for manuscripts. I would like to keep it in (reasons in comments) - please all take a look and vote on https://github.com/swcarpentry/good-enough-practices-in-scientific-computing/issues/180 today. (The deadline for resubmission is tomorrow.)
> Nihil pro nobis sine nobis.
> Gepsc mailing list
> Gepsc at lists.software-carpentry.org
More information about the Gepsc